Judges evaluate submitted solutions using the following criteria. Judges assign a numerical score for each criterion from which an average score for each solution is calculated. Each criterion has equal weight. After solutions have been evaluated, a ranked-list of solutions is then created for further consideration by the Judges. Judges deliberate twice: once to select finalists and again to select winners.

• Alignment: The solution correctly addresses the Social Issue in question.

• People-driven Solution: The solution entirely focuses on helping solve the problem in hand, without any ulterior motives (such as promotion or products) being the primary goal.

• Social Impact: The solution is impacting the intended population.

• Feasibility: The team has a realistic, practical plan for implementing the solution, and it is feasible in the given context.

• Innovative Approach: The solution includes a unique approach to a social issue, new technology, a new business model, or a new process for solving the Challenge.

• Understanding uniqueness of a Community or Group: The solution is designed with and for underserved communities, and the solution team are working closely with the community and embodies and addresses key social issues particular to that community through their solution.